BC Faculty Donated Exclusively to Democratic Campaigns in 2014-15

bc faculty
A demonstrator wears Democratic presidential candidate's Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Hillary Clinton buttons during a rally to condemn Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump's remarks about women and abortion, Thursday, March 31, 2016, in New York. (AP Photo/Mary Altaffer)

As the presidential election draws closer, students and faculty from universities across the nation join the political race. At Boston College, the conversation between students is diverse, as every background shapes differing political views. When observing donations made to campaigns by BC employees, however, the results are decidedly universal—every donation made by individuals listing BC as their primary employer was sent to Democratic political campaigns.

The majority of campaigns supported by BC faculty were not, in fact, in support of any particular presidential candidates—the campaign garnering the most support was that of Eric Kingson, a Congressman from upstate New York and a former BC professor.

Twenty-five percent of donations made by BC faculty members were in support of the professor and social security adviser’s run for Congress. The second-most popular campaign, however, was in favor of a presidential candidate. Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s campaign received 17.86 percent of donations made by BC faculty, a distinct advantage over the 3.57 percent made to Senator Bernie Sanders’ “Bernie 2016” campaign. Other campaigns garnering support included ActBlue, a Democratic fundraising effort, and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.

hillary clinton

This data isn’t surprising, as it is not unusual to see professors and educators leaning left in their political stances. According to a study published in The Daily Signal in January, professors who identify as liberal outnumber conservatives five to one. Yet the conversation at BC extends beyond left-wing politics.

Jason Donnelly, professor of theology and a current town meeting member in his hometown of Arlington, Mass., elaborated on his experience with politics as a BC graduate school student.

“There was a wonderful political diversity,” he said. “It was great because there was a wide spectrum of political beliefs and a kind of commitment to reasonable engagement. Topics were engaged in confidence, with a kind of trusting relationship—it was never a debate.”

Looking only at active donors may not be an accurate representation of the entire BC community, a fact worth considering before making generalizations based on the public records.

The political discussion on college campuses extends much farther than the limits of Chestnut Hill. In February, the Harvard Crimson released a report with results fairly similar to BC’s. Out of BC professors’ donations to only presidential campaigns, 83 percent went to Hillary Clinton, with 17 percent going to Bernie Sanders. At Harvard, 91 percent of donations to current presidential candidates went to Hillary Clinton in a similar majority. Their donation history did differ in that it did include Republican candidates—Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio, and Chris Christie received funding from Harvard faculty, instructors, and researchers.

Harvard does not have a history of subscribing to Jesuit ideals, however, which traditionally align with conservative politics. Georgetown University, a school that promotes the same Catholic values of BC, is also similar in political alignment. The Hoya disclosed in 2008 that over 70 percent of donated funds went toward Democratic candidates, with a distinct majority going directly to candidates’ campaigns rather than general party committees. The political environment on the campus is similarly diverse as well. Scott Fleming, assistant to the president for federal relations, said that “political dialogue on our [Georgetown] campus is pretty balanced” between parties. Based on their donation patterns in the past few years, both BC and Georgetown can be considered progressively liberal.

Policy appears more restricted when considering the University of Notre Dame, another notable Catholic institution. While BC allows for its faculty to consider their own political beliefs without consideration for the Catholic tradition, Notre Dame has proven to be more involved with its employees’ political alignment. In 2011, the National Catholic Register reported that Roxanne Martino “abruptly resigned” from her role on the university’s Board of Trustees after a month-long scandal concerning her sizable donations to political-action committees that identified as pro-choice.

The National Catholic Register calls Notre Dame “the nation’s preeminent Catholic university,” and the institution has received pressure from Catholic institutions to uphold traditional Catholic ideals.  After the university honored President Barack Obama in its 2009 commencement ceremonies, bishops across the country renounced the university, and the Cardinal Newman Society launched a petition campaign in favor of the faith’s traditional values. BC and Georgetown’s faculty are still afforded open political liberalism as the institutions have avoided backlash from the Catholic Church.

While Catholic values may not align with the political left-wing, BC’s faculty does—at least according to the public records available on campaign donations.

Featured Image by Mary Altaffer / AP Photo

Graphic by Abby Paulson / Heights Editor

  • 92eagle

    It is disappointing to me that BC isn’t more politically diverse!

  • Anonymous Poster

    This article is a feeble attempt to even understand how the Catholic faith aligns with political ideology. Do some research before writing articles, please. To associate and or water down Jesuit or Catholic ideals strictly with/to “conservative” politics is a clear misrepresentation of the faith. Catholicism isn’t a political ideology. There are many beliefs that fall under both, American liberalism and conservatism. In addition, there are even more beliefs that don’t fall under either spectrum. Also, I highly suggest the author check out Pew research data to see that Catholics are split when it comes to identifying as Democrats or Republicans (44% Democrat, 37% Republican) http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/02/23/u-s-religious-groups-and-their-political-leanings/

    Lastly, what point were you trying to make with this piece? You are comparing a member of the Board of Trustees (who is charge of running the school and aligning the actions of the school with its mission) to faculty members at Georgetown and BC. The rolls are completely different. A better alternative would be to look at how the faculty are treated at Notre Dame. Please stop watering down Catholicism to political ideology and take a few minutes to realize it is a bit more complex than how this article makes it out to be.

    • Rod Riguo

      Anonymous, why don’t you identify yourself? Your comment carries considerable insight and depth. You are quite right that Catholicism isn’t a political ideology. However, Ms. Channel does make a noteworthy observation that the faculty of several leading Catholic institutions of higher learning place their financial support behind behind ideals supported by the Democratic Party many times more than they support the Republican Party.

      Though she does not explicitly say so, there is quite an irony here. The faculty of our most prominent Catholic Universities overwhelmingly support a political party whose policies and platform have in recent decades been diametrically opposed to the Catholic Church’s teachings on the most fundamental issues affecting the human person. What is more fundamental than the sanctity of human life from conception onward, the institution of marriage as instituted by God in Genesis in Genesis to join male and female as one flesh, freedom of conscience and freedom of religion?