The Boston College Office of Student Involvement (OSI)—which oversees student organizations on campus—has launched an investigation into the BC Republicans for hosting an unapproved speaker event that drew backlash within the University community.
“The speaker event hosted by the BC College Republicans on Monday, 10/20, was not approved by the Office of Student Involvement,” Kyle Neary, associate director of organizations and programs in the OSI, wrote in a statement to The Heights. “The University is aware of concerns raised regarding the event and is investigating the matter further to determine if any violations of the Student Code of Conduct or University Speaker Policy occurred.”
On Monday night, the BC Republicans hosted Nick Solheim, CEO of the conservative organization American Moment, for a talk, during which he made several politically inflammatory remarks.
In response to the Solheim event, multiple student organizations issued public condemnations of both the event and Solheim’s remarks. The College Democrats of Boston College were the first to speak out, with a statement on Instagram that has since garnered over 850 likes.
“Our campus community should be a space for debate grounded in truth, intellectual curiosity, and mutual respect,” they wrote. “Instead, this event spread conspiracy theories and extremist ideas that put members of the BC community – particularly LGBTQ+ and immigrant students and staff – at risk.”
The Gavel, the progressive student newspaper on campus, echoed these concerns, describing Solheim’s remarks as fear-mongering.
“We recognize and encourage difficult conversations and productive discourse, but Solheim’s rhetoric employs fear-mongering techniques and places marginalized individuals on campus at risk,” The Gavel, a progressive student newspaper, wrote in a social media statement. “Statements such as ‘they will kill you and everyone you love to get what they want’ have no place anywhere, let alone on a college campus.”
According to the University speaker policy, all registered student organizations must consult with OSI before inviting a guest speaker to campus.
“Before any invitation to a potential speaker or guest to campus, student leaders must consult with their assigned representative in the Office of Student Involvement or the Bowman Center,” the policy reads.
If found responsible for policy violations, the group could face sanctions ranging from a general warning to probation, loss of privileges, or disbandment, according to the Student Code of Conduct.

Nick • Oct 26, 2025 at 9:09 am
Class of ’04 here.
Last Monday, as I gathered my stuff getting ready to leave the classroom, two of my students exuberantly discussed some rather extremist topic. At times, they tapped each other on the back as if finally finding their long lost soulmates. With a doctoral dissertation on media depictions of Hitler/Nazism and their receptions on my resume, I quietly listened attentively. Then those two kids surprised me with a streak of question, “So which side are you on? We’ve never heard you talk about politics in class. Perhaps as a professor, you’re not supposed to take sides?” These kids are in my film class.
I’ve been long popular among students on both/all sides, red or blue. This is how I responded to these two students’ questions: “My doctoral studies advisor was a left extremist activist while a close friend of mine since my late teens has been a Neo-Nazi. Back in the days when my Neo-Nazi friend and I initiated our interchange, he drew this clear line wanting me to respect his political doctrines as his ‘religion.’ Over the past 28 years, we have no problem exchanging ideas– no verbal attack or attempt to proselytize the other. We don’t let our beliefs consume us. Yes, everyone has the right to speak. But talking at a podium is a privilege, not a right. And a privilege comes with a responsibility. In addition to normal information giving, a talk with a mic is meant to inspire, not incite. ” I was proud of being an Eagle; I still am–primarily for the first-class education I received. But I have to admit that, as an Asian and international student, I found my days at BC challenging, stressful. After all, our student body wasn’t as diverse back then. One’s political identity, subconsciously, is often built around a kind of regression–he/she resumes back to the stage where he/she is haunted by the fear that things he/she owns or s/he believes s/he deserves may be taken away at any time. We are all adults–or, are we?
Joseph Miller • Oct 25, 2025 at 9:03 pm
Millions of Americans celebrated Charlie Kirk’s death. Nick’s comments are empirically defensible. Perhaps the comments hit too close to home and create a dynamic where the left might have to contend with its own culture problem? Nick is a patriot. If y’all don’t like hearing that millions of people would kill their political opponents if they could, then tell millions of people on the left to seek Jesus.
Patrick Tully • Oct 24, 2025 at 9:25 pm
“Statements such as ‘they will kill you and everyone you love to get what they want’ have no place anywhere, let alone on a college campus.”
Cool, except a dude just got assassinated in front of thousands, ON A COLLEGE CAMPUS, while advocating for SOLHEIM’S EXACT VIEWPOINTS
Progressives are so hilariously out of touch
lmao • Oct 25, 2025 at 8:00 pm
There are kids that get shot in front of their classmates for simply being at school…..this violence is NOT new.
Rachel Felten • Oct 24, 2025 at 8:09 am
What happened to free speech? Have republicans not been targets of assassinations and attempted assassinations the last few years?
STC • Oct 26, 2025 at 8:46 pm
No they haven’t.
Nancy Pelosi was targeted for kidnapping and her husband Paul was attacked. By a Trump supporter.
Rachel Hortman and her husband were assassinated. By a Trump supporter.
John Hoffman and his wife Yvette Hoffman were shot and left for dead and their daughter was nearly shot. By a Trump supporter.
Gretchen Whitmer was the target of an assassination plot. By a Trump supporter.
Trump’s “ear injury” where is the scar? Where is the damage to structure of his ear? Doesn’t exist. But the alleged shooter? Trump supporter.
Stop your nonsense.
Lydia • Oct 23, 2025 at 8:04 pm
Great reporting by BC Heights. This is what good journalism looks like
Matthias Osadcii • Oct 23, 2025 at 7:53 pm
Solid article !! Personally, I find this kind of suppression of thought and expression pretty harmful to general public discourse, especially on college campuses, which are sorta supposed to encourage individual thought and debate. I imagine that the reason the Republican organization didn’t pursue an official approval for their speaker is because they would not have been likely to recieve one; when college leadership has the power to encourage or discourage certain political opinions by limiting the speakers and ideas that are allowed to come onto campus, it only polarizes both sides more and harms our ability to communicate in cooperation. I do not like Nick Solheim, my point overall is that people *should* be allowed to express ideas (however inflammatory) on college campuses to encourage actual debate— if the OSI takes real action to suppress or revoke the privileges of the Republican organization, it will simply serve to drive those that resonate with Solheim’s ideas to further see the left as antagonistic, and it will drive the left to further antagonize right-leaning students on campus for sharing their thoughts because “you’re part of ‘them'”. We’re all human actors with legitimate goals and ideas, however misguided– let’s not forget that the only way to truly communicate with others is with a fully open mind and work towards genuine tolerance and cooperation (even if an individual’s ideas are not in favor of that ‘tolerance and cooperation,’ it’s important that all are given a chance to voice, and/or change, their minds.)
Chris • Oct 23, 2025 at 4:09 pm
republicans not following the rules, color me shocked.