As competition for admission to elite colleges intensifies, many high school seniors battle for perfect GPAs, strong test scores, and robust extracurriculars—just to get rejected from their dream school.
For one student applying to Boston College, though, a rejection letter wasn’t the end of the story.
“I got denied, and then a few days later, I got called by my admissions counselor at BC,” said Olivia.
BC offered an alternative path to admission—the Foundations Program—a back door for 15 of the University’s most connected applicants.
That back door takes the shape of a 30-credit transitional year at BC’s Messina College, an associate’s degree program “designed to help first-generation and low-income students transfer into a bachelor’s degree program or launch their careers,” according to the Messina website.
Foundations students then transfer to the Chestnut Hill campus, provided they maintain a 3.4 GPA or receive a recommendation from the dean of Messina College.
Editor’s Note: In reporting this story, The Heights interviewed 27 percent of the current Foundations Program class and one former Foundations student. The Heights has given these students fake names in order to protect their privacy.
“They Kind of Set Our Applications Aside”
Students do not apply to the Foundations Program. Rather, the Admission Committee selects applicants from the traditional bachelor’s degree pool, according to Dean of Undergraduate Admission and Financial Aid Grant Gosselin.
“They told us that when we applied, they kind of set our applications aside,” said Zach. “They were like, ‘We really want to get this person into BC, if there’s room, we’ll put them in with the normal class.’ And then if there’s not, they really wanted to find a way for us to get in, so they have this Foundations Program.”
Gosselin said in a statement to The Heights that most students are accepted into the Foundations Program from the early decision stage, in part because they have “articulated a strong desire to pursue a Jesuit education at Boston College.”
When asked what distinguishes a Foundations student from those rejected from or accepted to the Chestnut Hill campus, Gosselin said they would “benefit from a smaller first-year experience,” and have a “desire to live in community with our associates degree students.” He did not provide information on why Foundations students particularly fit this description after repeated requests to elaborate further.
“Foundations students are competitive applicants who are selected for the values they espouse through service commitments and other factors that align with BC’s mission,” Gosselin wrote.
Through interviews conducted by The Heights, however, some students shared that they were either deferred or rejected before later receiving a phone call with an offer of admission from their admission counselors. Other students were directly accepted to Foundations without a prior rejection or deferral.
“Beginning in Fall 2024, Foundations students’ offers of admission are extended at the same moment in time as other admitted students,” Gosselin said.
Olivia was rejected in December 2024, prior to her acceptance into Foundations.
Multiple Foundations students reported confusion when searching for further information about the program.
“My initial response was to, like, look it up and kind of research it and see what it was, and there really wasn’t anything on it,” said Jane, a current Foundations student. “I honestly didn’t really know what I was getting into.”
A student admitted to the 2024 inaugural class, after having been deferred, was told by a University admission counselor to “be prepared to go into this blind.”
“She said that she doesn’t really know that much about it, just because it’s the first year, and nothing like this has really ever existed,” said James. “She said, ‘If you say yes to this, be prepared to not have a lot of questions answered.’”
Because prospective students don’t apply directly to Foundations, the admission office doesn’t advertise the program to high schools or applicants, Gosselin said.
“We provide detailed information about the opportunity to students when offers of admission are extended,” Gosselin wrote. “The Foundations Program is promoted on the Messina College website and we refer students who inquire.”
Several students shared that they participated in BC summer programs leading up to the application cycle, and most applied early decision.
“We all really wanted to go to BC, that was, like, our top choice,” Zach said. “I think if we just applied regular decision, I don’t think we would have been selected.”
“They Come From Money, You Can Just Tell”
In a review of public documents, The Heights found that 20 percent of this year’s Foundations class have familial donations to the University, ranging from thousands of dollars to over a million. Of those students, two were found to have family-endowed hockey and football scholarships, which require at least $100,000 to establish.
Of the 15 students currently enrolled in the program, The Heights found 11 have had family members attend the University. Of those, four have had four or more members of their family attend BC.
“BC has always been like, kind of in my family, and it’s always been a strong connection for me,” Olivia said. “All my siblings went here.”
Two students were found to have family members serving on the University’s Board of Regents, which provides support to the University President and Board of Trustees on matters related to BC and its future.
“One of my parents went here, and my sibling went here, so they know that, you know, I’m committed to BC,” Zach said. “A lot of the Foundation parents are actively involved. One of my parents is actually on an alumni board.”
When asked why a disproportionate amount of Foundations students had apparent connections to BC, University Spokesman Jack Dunn attributed this overrepresentation to the program’s novelty.
“Like Messina College, the Foundations Program provides a pathway for students who desire a Jesuit education to attend Boston College,” Dunn wrote in a statement to The Heights. “It is not surprising that families closest to BC who are most familiar with our offerings would be among the first to participate in a new program.”
When asked whether Foundations students reflect the typical financial need and first-generation status of Messina students, Gosselin stated that “like all BC applicants, Foundation students vary in need.”
Patti and Jonathan Kraft Family Dean of Messina College Rev. Erick Berrelleza, S.J., added that “being first-generation is not a requirement of the Foundations program.”
Despite their shared presence at Messina College, Foundations students pay $95,240, a little more than the Chestnut Hill campus’ cost of attendance, while Messina’s cost of attendance is $40,000 less.
Sarah, a current Foundations student, shared how she recognized that the program significantly differs from Messina College.
Multiple students also noted an awkward transition during summer move-in due to obvious differences between the student populations.
“There was a very big, ‘We’re us, they’re them’ at the beginning of the summer,” Sarah said. “It was just awkward at first, because it’s just such different, like, it’s, like, such different programs.”
As a result, many Foundations students don’t feel like they are entirely BC or Messina students, but rather somewhere in between.
“We have a foot in each door, and it’s really tough,” said James. “Trying to be 100 percent a Messina student when you’re with the Messina students, and then completely code-switch to try to be 100 percent a BC student with BC students.”
Olivia stated that Foundations students were told they could act as leaders to Messina students.
“When I first started, like, learning about the Foundations program, I noticed that there was a part in the catalog that wrote about how Foundation students can act as leaders for Messina kids, as they’re first-year students—or first-generation students,” said Olivia.
When asked if Foundations students are told to act as leaders on Brookline Campus, Gosselin did not explicitly confirm or deny whether that is the case.
“Messina provides a wide range of support to assist our first-generation students with tools for success, as these students often report less familiarity with how to navigate college,” Gosselin wrote in a statement to The Heights. “One goal of the Foundations Program is to establish connections and friendships between students from different backgrounds to benefit both groups of students. Foundations students benefit in their own education from learning about the unique perspectives of Messina College students.”
University staff repeatedly emphasized that Foundations is part of BC, not Messina, several students said.
“They stress that we’re BC students,” said Sarah. “They’re like, ‘You are not Messina College, you are BC students,’ but it’s like, everything you do in this program contradicts that.”
One of the students said the promise of her status as a “BC student” was something that drew her to the program.
“I remember one thing from my meeting with the admissions guy from BC—he said, ‘You’re still going to be a BC student,’ and that was really important to me, making sure I felt like, not separated from everyone else and all the other freshmen,” said Olivia.
While interviewees differed on whether they felt more tied to the Brookline or Chestnut Hill campus, one distinction between Foundations students and their Messina peers is evident.
“Just to be honest, I mean, I see everyone in my program is wearing Chanel bags,” Sarah said. “They come from money, you can just tell.”

Julie Belou • Feb 28, 2026 at 7:31 am
This was called the Challenge Program back in the 80’s. It was designed for kids with a circumstance that put them into another category when considering admission. For me, I was the child of a faculty member, with decent grades, but not the best. I was given the opportunity to prove myself, by taking a year with of classes while enrolled in the evening college. If my GPA, was high enough, and the professors agreed, I would apply as a transfer student, and maybe be admitted as a Sophomore. I lived at home, and would have paid for the classes, if not for the generous benefit of Tuition remission for faculty children. The program was not as fancy back then, but it sounds similar.
Julie Belou • Feb 28, 2026 at 7:41 am
I forgot to mention that I am a very proud member of the class of 1989, and please excuse the grammar mistakes in my previous post.
Michael McKenna • Feb 26, 2026 at 4:20 pm
Grandson of a proud BC alum. This sounds like the College of Basic Studies program at BU. A proven idea over decades with great results. Creative, smart thinking by BC. AMDG.
Mike • Feb 26, 2026 at 5:29 pm
yea but the college of general studies at BU is not a ‘backdoor’ nor is it for legacy kids/well-connected kids. messina is great! this ‘foundations’ thing? not so much
JB • Feb 26, 2026 at 12:18 pm
The article is well done. These are the difficult issues that it is important for a free press to examine despite conflicts of interest. BC will benefit from this transparency. Nevertheless, I truly hope that all readers and those involved show the maturity not to target any of the students over their identities as Foundation or Messina or otherwise. Every one of us was born into a situation beyond our control and our identities and background do not define us.
Michael Gasson • Feb 26, 2026 at 5:40 am
Bring the nepo babies in! sports already get pebbles for funding and now we’re gonna complain when donors’ kids get in through the back door? We need those dollars or we’re gonna join the Patriot League
Mike • Feb 26, 2026 at 5:32 pm
Idk man, most schools manage similar programs just fine without 70k+ tuition
Dylan • Feb 25, 2026 at 5:10 pm
Really gross that they want to emphasize to these Foundations students that they’re “BC students, not Messina students” when they wanted to reassure “Messina” students that they were BC students just like everyone else. Guess that whole “Messina students are BC students too” bit was a lie.
HC alum • Feb 25, 2026 at 3:39 pm
Wow. I was suspicious of this program to begin with. Just a money making grab by BC. Not in the Jesuit tradition. Shame
Dylan • Feb 25, 2026 at 3:28 pm
Aren’t Foundations students technically not eligible for financial aid anyway? From what I understand, the program isn’t actually a credential/degree-granting program; it’s meant to “prep” students for a bachelor’s program. But such programs don’t even get financial aid. So if that’s the case, it’s very clear what kind of student/family can actually afford Foundations without financial aid. To pretend that these students represent any other socioeconomic demographic aside from the wealthy is just asinine.
Hoya Saxa • Feb 25, 2026 at 3:21 pm
All that for Boston College???
Lyd • Feb 25, 2026 at 2:35 pm
More great reporting the heights!
BCKid • Feb 25, 2026 at 1:47 pm
These quotes from Gosselin are ridiculous lol.
They’re accepted because they have “articulated a strong desire to pursue a Jesuit education at BC?” Don’t all applicants desire to pursue an education at BC, by nature of applying? Is he saying that they’re accepted because they’re ‘more Catholic’? How do you draw that line?
They would “benefit from a smaller first-year experience”? Aren’t there plenty of non-Foundations students who would also benefit from this? What about them? Also, if they wanted a smaller first-year experience, why did they apply to the normal Chestnut Hill campus?
They are different because they have a “desire to live in community with our associates degree students”? But they didn’t apply directly to Foundations, so…??
And the kicker of “He did not provide information on why Foundations students particularly fit this description after repeated requests to elaborate further.”
These non-answers and all the question-dodging is a really bad look and frankly not convincing
BCParent • Feb 25, 2026 at 11:23 am
Like most things, it’s important to have balance, especially in perspective. A very small percentage of students were interviewed for this story and the comments provided are not reflective of this program. I’m writing as a parent of the Foundations program – who is not a donor to BC, nor an alum, nor connected to the university in any way prior to this program.
BC, and the Dean of Messina in particular, created a great program substantially benefiting our student in preparing them to excel at BC. It has been thoughtfully structured and provides access to some Chestnut Hill classes that otherwise would be nearly impossible to get because of demand for the class and which are taught by some of BC’s outstanding, most desired professors. It has also exposed our student to developing strong friendships with the first generation students at Messina, where I also witnessed our student ensure their Messina friends felt integrated and welcomed at Chestnut Hill activities to allow for as much of a seamless transition as is possible. It also affords our student access to leading BC professors that mentor them and truly encourage cura personalis. We see a significant change in our student, with deep gratitude to BC and the Foundations program for identifying them as a good candidate and to enabling their development in this way.
The program is in its infancy and like anything new it will continue to improve over time. This article does not provide a well-rounded perspective, and should instead commend BC for developing, deploying, and improving various pathways to a successful BC college experience and outcomes.
Chestnut Hill Student • Feb 25, 2026 at 11:54 am
No one is disputing that the program can benefit students who are in it. The concern raised in the article is about who gets quietly routed into this very small, opaque pathway and why. Pointing to one student’s positive experience doesn’t really engage with that question — especially when the comment itself acknowledges the key fact: the student did not get into BC through the standard process.
That matters. Because the Foundations pathway is being presented here as a purely merit- and mission-driven opportunity, while the reality — at least from the outside — looks much closer to a second-chance lane that disproportionately favors families with the means to take it. When a student who was not admitted through the front door can still access BC via a boutique transitional year, and that option is financially viable only for some families, it inevitably starts to look like a pay-to-win mechanic, whether intended or not.
What makes the contrast sharper is the lack of acknowledgment of structural differences. Many Messina students are first-generation and low-income and are performing at a high level despite significantly fewer resources and far more constraints. If a student arrives without those same barriers and ultimately performs similarly, that’s not exactly the mic-drop moment it’s being framed as. It highlights how much heavier the lift is for the students the Messina model was originally designed to support.
And the point about forming friendships with first-gen students is frankly beside the issue. BC has a large first-generation population across campus; building community with them does not require a specialized admissions pathway. Bringing that up doesn’t really strengthen the defense of the program — it mostly reads like padding around the central concern, which is access and equity in admissions, not whether students in the program are socially well-adjusted
Maryland • Feb 25, 2026 at 8:58 am
“Foundations students are told to act as leaders to Messina students”: this is outrageous, condescending at best, racist at worst.
Skip Barry • Feb 25, 2026 at 5:27 pm
It’s badly expressed. That’s for sure. It’s condescending, but likely not meant to be racist. Some inarticulate administrator desperately scratching his/her brain for words, is probably the case.
Iman • Feb 25, 2026 at 8:14 am
Great article, but this pissed me off:
So, officialy, the Foundations Program is a “holistic transitional pathway.” Unofficially — at least from the outside — it looks suspiciously like Admissions saying, “We regret to inform you… unless.”
Let’s be clear: bridge programs themselves aren’t the problem. Plenty of universities run them to support students who need academic runway, and when they’re transparent and equity-driven, they can be genuinely powerful mobility tools. The issue raised here is the opacity. When students can’t apply, criteria aren’t public, and the program reportedly includes a noticeable share of wealthy or well-connected admits, it stops looking like student support and starts looking like admissions fine print.
BC loves to market its Jesuit values — access, equity, formation of the whole person. That branding hits a little differently if a quiet side door exists that only some applicants ever hear about. If the pathway is truly merit- and mission-driven, then transparency should be easy. Publish the criteria. Publish the demographics. Show the outcomes. Sunlight is free.
Instead, what this article describes feels less like a bridge and more like a selective pressure valve for the admissions office: deny publicly, admit quietly, and call it formation.
To be fair, BC is not the only institution experimenting with alternative admit pathways. But if the university wants the moral high ground it often claims, the standard can’t just be “technically defensible.” It has to be clearly, demonstrably fair.
Right now, the optics are rough. And at a school that prides itself on cura personalis, the admissions process shouldn’t feel like it comes with an asterisk and a family-friend exception clause.
KD • Feb 25, 2026 at 5:42 pm
Notre Dame has a similar program called Gateway. They take approximately 75 “promising students,” that for whatever reason just missed the mark of being accepted to Notre Dame. They do year one at Holy Cross College, a junior college in South Bend and if they have a 3.5 or higher (and no grade lower than a B), they are automatically accepted in to Notre Dame at sophomores.
Most of the spots are for kids with fantastic involvement and community service that we’re just shy of ND admissions standards with grades & scores. However, I met a parent who said that their family was connected heavily to Notre Dame and claimed that their child got to use this program as a back door entry to ND.
What can you do? 🤷♀️ Is it really that big of a deal? Ultimately, the support of the University by donors enhances the experience of all students, and enables the endowment to fund students facing economic hardship. I think it’s pretty common…Harvard admissions has its “Z List.”